Serious Business; maybe


NYTimesBBCMeta: CNN via YouTube

Surprise, surprise, it’s over the “T” word. I don’t want politics to interrupt the spazzy fun, but since this concerns two of my favorite things in the world, I thought I’d take a moment. The gist of the story is that Google noticed a few days ago YouTube access from China sharply dropped, and they discovered the site is no longer working in the region. News networks are speculating it is due to a recently upload video of police assaulting protesters during a riot. The Chinese government has come out with a statement saying that supporters of the Tibetan movement doctored video to “deceive the international community” and that “China is not afraid of the Internet.”

Okay, I guess I’ve been living under a rock, because I was always under the impression that YouTube is permanently defunct in China. Not so apparently, since this is the first time in a while that the Chinese government has issued a block.

No matter where you stand on Tibet, and the international media’s reporting of Chinese affairs, I hope people see that this level of censorship, if indeed this is what happened, isn’t appropriate. IMO the Chinese government is doing their cause a disservice because they’ve only drawn attention to something that otherwise may have gone unnoticed.

Believe me when I say this, people in China are not stupid, and they certainly are not ignorant. If someone as computer illiterate as me knows how to use a proxy, you can bet that netizens of the new China knows how to get information despite the governments best attempts. I don’t know how exactly the general public there feels on issues such as Tibet or censorship. However, I would guess that the people there, especially those a part of the Internet culture, are a whole lot less Commie, and a whole lot more open-minded then America makes them out to be.

The point is, fighting against a medium as fluid and dynamic as the Internet is a losing battle, and at this point China really can’t have it both ways. If they want to be considered a modern world power, having a strong Internet presence is a must. However, the trade-off is that they have to give up some control over people’s access to information. That’s not a moral statement, it’s a pragmatic one. The government is fighting a battle they can’t win. Net culture is only going to get bigger in China, and blocking websites like YouTube is not going to do anything except bring more negative attention to themselves.

As far a greatness goes, these two are pretty high up there. Some historical figures lose their relevance as time passes, but as an American and a student of science, I feel their metaphorical presence everyday. It’s not just about what they accomplished, but how they changed the fundamental way we view our world as well as ourselves.

Read the Gettysburg Address here

Read chapter four of The Origin of Species here

I’m really sick of America’s attitude toward Israel. Sixty years of history back up the fact that the Israeli state is a complicated affair, yet America’s attitude is consistently unilateral. Israel = always right. Palestinians = always wrong. Israel killing civilians = protecting their country. Hamas killing civilians = terrorist.

For all our touting of peace and democracy in the Middle East, why do we not support a ceasefire? This is exactly why the rest of the world hates us.

This is really horrible and sad news. It even made front page on the NYTimes website today. I thought I’d post this because some of you may know this as the company that sponsored Fahrenheit and S.H.E. for their concerts a while back. Actually, I’m not sure it’s the same company, does anyone know?

Corporation shadiness is pretty much a worldwide concept. While embezzlement and fraud is one thing, knowingly selling tainted milk, a product essentially made for children, is taking despicable to another level. The Chinese government is absolutely right in heavily pursuing this (death penalty talk aside), and I really hope those executives pay for what they did.

That being said, I hate how insanely biased the NYT (and every other news organization in the world) is sometimes. In a ~500 word article about tainted milk, variations on the phrase “state-run media” was printed five times. This isn’t an article about persecution of Tibetan monks or something. As far as I could tell, China is trying to do the right thing for it’s people by holding these executives accountable. It saddens me that everything has to turn into a political battleground.

Years ago, stories like this would have been swept under the rug with a well placed bribe here or there, but that’s not what’s happening now. What exactly is the government trying to cover up that warrants all this suspicion about the “state-run media?” While I don’t even come close to being a supporter of China and its political ways, I think the efforts it’s making are respectable, and should be commended.

But of course, in America’s eyes, China will always be seen as the festering red sore on the face of democracy. Perfect.

Same as before. Apologies if I offend you, but I stand by my words.

(more…)

Next Page »